I led the design and research for a suite of geospatial tools for the US Forest Service inorder to improve the management of national system trails.

Built on ESRI's suite of geospatial tools, the solution included a mobile app for field data collection, a web app for managers, and a backend data-loading mechanism that synchronized collected data with the national system of record. The mobile app supported three tailored surveys: for agency staff, partner organizations, and the general public

Responsibilities

Research, Analysis, Workshop Facilitation, Strategy, Product Design, User Testing

Timeline

9 months to MVP release

Tools

Adobe XD, Invision, Survey123, ArcGIS Online, Javascript, Agile

Overview

Problem

The Forest Service oversees 160K+ miles of public trails, but relied on outdated, manual processes for collecting and reporting trail data. Crews used paper forms and disconnected systems, which led to inefficiencies, inconsistent reporting, and difficulty to demonstrate the full scope of work required to accurately maintain our nation's trails.

Goal

Design a modern geospatial application suite (mobile and web) that empowers field crews to log trail conditions and resources efficiently — even offline — while enabling managers to access accurate, standardized data across regions. The solution needed to reduce inefficiencies, improve data quality, and scale across 10+ legacy applications for nationwide trail management.

Research

Mapping the Ecosystem

The trails ecosystem supports a layered network of internal and external users. Mapping the trails ecosystem was essential to understand how information flowed between field staff, national leadership, and external partners.

Diagram of trails ecosystem roles from district and forest staff to regional, national, and external stakeholders

User Interviews

Through remote interviews with 24 users, I gained a detailed picture of workflows, constraints, and priorities from crew members to leadership.  Other key insights were:

Data flowed upward, but rarely downward

Field staff rarely saw how their data influenced planning or funding, recducing motivation to capture accurate info.

No unified process across regions

Data collection workflows differed across regions, forests, and districts. This fragmentation eroded trust in the data.

Overly complex systems discouraged use

Crews found the existing interfaces too bloated and cumbersome, often bypassing data entry entirely.

Need for lightweight, flexible tools

Crews consistently asked for mobile, offline-capable tools that fit seamlessly into their fieldwork, rather than complex systems requiring extra effort.

Personas

Persona: Nadine Smith, Washington Office Manager. Responsibilities, goals, frustrations, and considerations listed.
Persona: Alex Dean, Trail Tech. Profile shows responsibilities, goals, frustrations, and considerations.
“Persona: Jermaine Clark, Regional Manager. Includes responsibilities, goals, frustrations, and considerations.
Persona: Josh Butler, Forest Trail Manager. Details responsibilities, goals, frustrations, and considerations

Feature Prioritization & Roadmap Planning

Prioritization matrix showing tasks grouped into Quick Wins, Big Bets, If Time, and Rethink.

DESIGN

How might we transform trail management into a seamless, data-driven process that empowers crews and informs leadership?

To address this question, we built two streamlined Survey123 prototypes to find the best fit for users' mental models: one organized by trail feature type, the other by action needed.

We also made key design decisions to support use in challenging field conditions:

  • The ability to mark the user's location with a pin during logging
  • Pre-populating trail data to reduce cognitive load & redundant entry
  • Minimal text input to allow for quick logging in poor weather
  • Offline capability for use in remote backcountry areas
gif of a flowchart showing feature type, then action or inventory, then details
vs
gif of a flowchart showing action or inventory, then feature type, then details

ITERATE

I conducted A/B testing with six users to determine which organizational method best aligned with their mental models.

User feedback showed a preference for the action-oriented prototype, aligning with actual work processes. We identified several additional user needs that were crucial for improving the tool's effectiveness:

  • Enhanced high-contrast interface for better visibility in bright sunlight
  • Image and file upload options to provide context
  • Broader, more intuitive feature categories that mirrored how they thought about trail elements

Final Designs

In addition to the agency's survey, we built additional tools to support the entire trails network.

Laptop showing TACO map (Trails Assessment and Conditions Overview) with green markers of trail features across the United States and Alaska. Sidebar includes welcome text and navigation links.
Web Map

Serves as a central platform for visualizing, reviewing, and managing field-collected data.

Laptop showing Trail Manager Review dashboard for Region 8 with survey approval pie chart, feature map, and data table of trail assessments
QA/QC dashboard

Managers can now review data quality before it synced with the database, improving data integrity.

Three mobile screens of the Trails Assessment and Conditions Overview survey. Screens show item details form with location pin, trail overview page with trail attributes, and log trail issue page with tree size and condition fields
Agency, Partner, and Public Surveys

Unified surveys to maintain consistent data collection across all users, including external teams.

Map Style Guide & Symbology

Out in the field, agency staff, volunteers, and members of the public logged 1000+ of trail features through our mobile surveys. To keep this volume of data clear and usable in AGOL web maps, we designed a symbology system where shapes indicate survey type, icons represent the feature, and color signals urgency. By layering meaning this way, dense datasets became easy to scan, filter, and interpret—helping users quickly focus on what mattered most.

Diagram explaining symbology: outer shape defines survey type, inner shape defines feature, and background color indicates whether action is needed or it’s inventory only.Three icons for restriction device feature showing agency, public, and partner survey types with circular, octagonal, and square outer shapes.trail symbology legend for action needed with 10 categories shown in distinct colorsTrail symbology legend for inventory only with 10 categories shown in muted green

Flow: Logging an Action Item

iphone displaying screen flow of a user logging an action
iphone displaying flow steps of how a user would log an action item

OUTCOMES

The MVP was deployed agency-wide in March 2024.

We established continuous feedback loops to ensure our solution evolved with user needs across the trails ecosystem.

56,388
miles maintained within first 3 months of MVP rollout
22%
increase in # of records entering central database
95%
user satisfaction rate
20,000+
features logged within first 3 months of MVP rollout

LESSONS LEARNED

Align tools with real workflows

Understanding the disconnect between leadership and field crews helped us shift the focus from compliance-driven design to user-centered solutions.

Simplify to Scale

Reducing complexity in the form and automating backend logic helped standardize data while easing the burden on field users.

Build for the Full Ecosystem

Designing tools for managers, field crews, and partners ensured stronger collaboration and more complete data capture.